This was written by George Mueller
(1805-1898), who founded, built, and operated four large orphan homes in
nineteenth-century England, and supported countless missionaries around the worldall
by prayer alone. He never asked anyone for a single penny, or ever indicated in any way
that he needed money for God's work.

Before this time [1829], I had been much
opposed to the doctrines of election, particularly redemption and final persevering grace.
So much so, that a few days after my arrival at Teignmouth, [England], I called election a
devilish doctrine.
I did not believe that I had brought
myself to the Lord, for that was too manifestly false, but yet I held that I might have
resisted finally. And, further, I knew
nothing about the choice of God's people, and did not believe that the child of God, when
once made so, was safe forever. In my fleshly
mind I had repeatedly said, "If once I could prove that Im a child of God
forever, I might go back into the world for a year or two, and then return to the Lord,
and at last be saved.
But now I was brought to examine these
precious truths by the Word of God. Being
made willing to have no glory of my own in the conversion of sinners, but to consider
myself merely as an instrument; and being made willing to receive what the Scriptures
said, I went to the Word, reading the New Testament from the beginning, with a particular
reference to these truths.
To my great astonishment, I found that
the passages that speak decidedly for election and persevering grace, were about four
times as many as those that speak apparently against these truths. And even those few,
shortly after, when I had examined and understood them, served to confirm me in the above
doctrines [of election].
As to the effect that my belief in
these doctrines had on me, I'm constrained to state, for God's glory, that though I'm
still exceedingly weak, and by no means so dead to the lust of the flesh, and the lust of
the eyes, and the pride of life, as I might and as I ought to be, yet, by the grace of
God, I have walked more closely with Him since that time.
My life has not been so variable, and I
may say that I live much more for God than before. And
for this I have been strengthened by the Lord, in a great measure, through the
instrumentality of these truths. For in the
time of temptation, I have been repeatedly led to say, "Should I thus sin? I should only bring misery into my soul for a
time, and dishonor God. For, being a child of God forever, I should have to be brought
back again, though it might be in the way of severe chastisement.
Thus, I say, the electing love of God
in Christ (when I have been able to realize it) has often been the means of producing
holiness, instead of leading me into sin. It
is only the notional apprehension of such truths, the want of having them in the heart,
while they are [still only] in the head, that is dangerous.
 |